Monument record 2487 - CLACH AN TRUSHAL, LEWIS

Summary

Standing stone

Location

Grid reference NB 37561 53777 (point)
Map sheet NB35SE
Island Lewis
Parish BARVAS, Western Isles

Map

Type and Period (1)

Full Description

NB35SE 1 3755 5377.

(NB 375 537) Clach an Trushal (NR)
OS 6" map, Ross-shire, 2nd ed., (1898)

The Thrushel Stone is about 20ft high, and almost as much in breadth.
M Martin 1934.

The Clach an Trushal stands 18ft 10 ins above ground, and measures about 6ft in width, 3ft 9 ins max. thickness, and 15ft 7 ins in girth at the base. From about halfway up the stone diminishes in thickness to about 1ft at the top. It faces nearly ESE and slants slightly to the S and W. RCAHMS 1928, visited July 1914.

Clach an Trushal, at NB 3755 5377, is as described and illustrated by the RCAHMS. The name is still known locally.
Visited by OS (N K B) 18 June 1969.

Clach an Trushal, standing stone, Ballantrushal, dated February 1934 and recorded in the Division of the General Register of Sasines for the County of Ross and Cromarty on 20 March 1934 is hereby in accordance with the provisions of section 1(5) of the above Act amended to describe the area of the scheduled monument as measuring 10m NW-SE by 7m to include the upright stone, the recumbent stones and an area of ground around them in which evidence relating to their erection and use may survive.
HS Schedule, 3.3.99

NB 3755 5377 The Trushal Stone is a standing stone famous for its size - 5.8m tall - reputed to be the tallest in Scotland.
There is no reference to any other standing stones in the immediate vicinity, either on the OS maps or in the literature, but local knowledge states that it once had a stone circle around it "like at Callanish", and that the stones were broken up and incorporated in nearby field walls and used as lintels in houses. They are known as "blue stones". The last erect standing stone "was cylindrical and was dug up" and used as a lintel in a local house shortly before the RCAHMS visit in Juyly 1914.
The Trushal Stone stands between two parallel field walls 8m apart, the wall on the SW side having been built sometime between 1898-1914, and the other a few years later.
Survey confirms that in these field walls there are many stones which have originated from the standing stones of the circle. These field walls come to within 3m of the Trushal Stone and extend to about 60m and 20m NW and 30m SE. Some stones are unbroken sausage shapes, about 0.4 x -0.4 x 1.5m long, and other are truncated cylinders of stones with sharp-edged breaks, and with a cross-section of about 0.4 x 0.4m. It is possible to differentiate these stones from the larger till stones generally used for the lowest course in the field walls hereabouts.
Based on the locations of the concentrations of these stones, and assuming that the builders of the walls would move the stones the minimum distance, it is possible to estimate where the stones of the reputed circle would have stood. Due to thorough field clearance and present soil cover, we found no visible evidence of stone holes or packing stones in situ.
For a distance of 17m NW of the Trushal Stone, the ground is relatively level, after which it slopes down. For 13m to the SE it is again relatively level after which it slopes up. This suggests a cut and fill modification to the natural ground surface to make a near-horizontal platform to accommodate a standing stone circle. Such platforms exist at other stone circles in the Outer Hebrides.
There is evidence, both physical and oral, for the former existence of a ring of stones around the Tursahal Stone, which may not have stood centrally. The stones are likely to have been about 1.5m tall, and the ring is likely to have been about 28-30m in diameter. It may have been circular, oval or flattened. Its centre would have been about 6m N of the Trushal Stone.
A slab, 0.75 x 1.50 x 0.20 m thick, lying at an angle of 30 degrees and with a void under it, may be an outlier. It is 35m NE of the Trushal Stone, and about 12m outside the ring.
Lying near the base of the Trushal Stone are two large stones: a block, 0.55 x 0.65 x 1.30m, which may have broken away from the top; and a slab, >0.18 x 0.90 x 1.15m, which may have broken away from the N edge.
Curtis and Curtis 2002, 119


Martin Martin, 1695a, A Description of the Western Islands of Scotland c. 1695, 8 (2nd ed., 1716) (Bibliographic reference). SWE5082.

RCAHMS, 1928, The RCAHMCS 9th Report & Inventory: Outer Hebrides, Skye and the Small Isles, , No. 16 (Bibliographic reference). SWE5587.

R W Feachem, 1963b, A Guide to Prehistoric Scotland, 81 (Bibliographic reference). SWE2141.

A Thom, 1967a, Megalithic Sites in Britain, 99, 129, 138 (Bibliographic reference). SWE7507.

G and M Ponting and Ponting, 1977b, The Standing Stones of Callanish, 31 (Bibliographic reference). SWE13307.

J N G and M Ritchie and Harman, 1985, Exploring Scotland's Heritage: Argyll and the Western Isles, 143, no. 77 (Bibliographic reference). SWE6206.

Sources/Archives (6)

  • --- Bibliographic reference: G and M Ponting and Ponting. 1977b. The Standing Stones of Callanish. 31.
  • --- Bibliographic reference: R W Feachem. 1963b. A Guide to Prehistoric Scotland. 1st. 81.
  • --- Bibliographic reference: Martin Martin. 1695a. A Description of the Western Islands of Scotland c. 1695. 4th. 8 (2nd ed., 1716).
  • --- Bibliographic reference: RCAHMS. 1928. The RCAHMCS 9th Report & Inventory: Outer Hebrides, Skye and the Small Isles. , No. 16.
  • --- Bibliographic reference: J N G and M Ritchie and Harman. 1985. Exploring Scotland's Heritage: Argyll and the Western Isles. 143, no. 77.
  • --- Bibliographic reference: A Thom. 1967a. Megalithic Sites in Britain. 99, 129, 138.

Finds (0)

Protected Status/Designation

Related Monuments/Buildings (0)

Related Events/Activities (0)

Record last edited

Mar 27 2008 2:08PM

Comments and Feedback

Do you have any questions or more information about this record? Please feel free to comment below with your name and email address. All comments are submitted to the website maintainers for moderation, and we aim to respond/publish as soon as possible. Comments, questions and answers that may be helpful to other users will be retained and displayed along with the name you supply. The email address you supply will never be displayed or shared.